# SafetyNet attestation test failed on iodé 6.6

**URL:** <https://community.iode.tech/t/safetynet-attestation-test-failed-on-iode-6-6/6795>\
**Category:** System and Apps\
**Tags:** SamsungS10\
**Created:** [2 September 2025 20:31 UTC](https://community.iode.tech/t/safetynet-attestation-test-failed-on-iode-6-6/6795 "2025-09-02T20:31:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rik](https://community.iode.tech/user_avatar/community.iode.tech/rik/32/1437_2.png) [@rik](https://community.iode.tech/u/rik)\
**Post date:** [23 February 2026 17:43 UTC](https://community.iode.tech/t/safetynet-attestation-test-failed-on-iode-6-6/6795/21 "2026-02-23T17:43:59Z")

</div>

SafetyNet itself is obsolete, but the microG toggle to enable it _does other things too_ to help attempt to pass integrity checks. “Google Play Integrity” is what newer apps will interrogate, and there are 3 levels, of which microG based devices will only pass the first level “basic integrity”. They more advanced level integrity checks aren’t yet able to be gotten around.

I am not an authority, but I personally don’t know that a locked / unlocked bootloader makes a difference in passing various checks under iodé as these checks are blocked?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![volker01](https://community.iode.tech/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/a698b9/32.png) [@volker01](https://community.iode.tech/u/volker01)\
**Post date:** [23 February 2026 19:30 UTC](https://community.iode.tech/t/safetynet-attestation-test-failed-on-iode-6-6/6795/22 "2026-02-23T19:30:41Z")

</div>

I think I’ve read here in the forum that iodé returns the bootloader as closed. I installed two test apps. Both give me back that the bootloader is locked, although it’s definitely open here. Samsung S10e with iodé 4.

[Previous page](https://community.iode.tech/t/safetynet-attestation-test-failed-on-iode-6-6/6795.md?page=1)